Comments on: How will ECMAScript "Harmony" affect ActionScript 3? http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/ Just another WordPress site Mon, 21 May 2012 15:06:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Discover ECMAScript 4: The Future of ActionScript - Josh Talks Flash http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1025 Discover ECMAScript 4: The Future of ActionScript - Josh Talks Flash Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:47:24 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1025 [...] Update: Since I wrote this article, some interesting news has surfaced. New information about this topic is available in my articles Some controversy over ECMAScript 4 and How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3. [...] [...] Update: Since I wrote this article, some interesting news has surfaced. New information about this topic is available in my articles Some controversy over ECMAScript 4 and How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3. [...]

]]> By: Some Controversy over ECMAScript 4 - Josh Talks Flash http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1024 Some Controversy over ECMAScript 4 - Josh Talks Flash Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:21:56 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1024 [...] Update: New information about this topic is available in my article How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3. [...] [...] Update: New information about this topic is available in my article How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3. [...]

]]> By: NateJC.com - Flash & ActionScript 3 info, source, & experiments » Blog Archive » Should Adobe follow the new ECMAScript 3.1 standard? http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1023 NateJC.com - Flash & ActionScript 3 info, source, & experiments » Blog Archive » Should Adobe follow the new ECMAScript 3.1 standard? Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:19:20 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1023 [...] How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3? [...] [...] How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3? [...]

]]> By: NateJC.com - Flash & ActionScript 3 info, source, & experiments » Blog Archive » Should Adobe follow the new ECMAScript 3.1 standard? http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1094 NateJC.com - Flash & ActionScript 3 info, source, & experiments » Blog Archive » Should Adobe follow the new ECMAScript 3.1 standard? Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:19:20 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1094 [...] How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3? [...] [...] How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3? [...]

]]> By: NateJC.com - Flash & ActionScript 3 info, source, & experiments » Blog Archive » Should Adobe follow the new ECMAScript 3.1 standard? http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1193 NateJC.com - Flash & ActionScript 3 info, source, & experiments » Blog Archive » Should Adobe follow the new ECMAScript 3.1 standard? Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:19:20 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1193 [...] How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3? [...] [...] How will ECMAScript “Harmony” affect ActionScript 3? [...]

]]> By: Macaca http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1022 Macaca Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:05:34 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1022 Adobe cant just scrap parts of the language.. removing packages and namespaces? I cant even remember it workend before. Also i second Erik Wilder's comment: AS doesnt need to strictly follow the standard: having your own added features (and being succesfull with it) is fine and may even improve the overall standard. Adobe cant just scrap parts of the language.. removing packages and namespaces? I cant even remember it workend before.

Also i second Erik Wilder’s comment: AS doesnt need to strictly follow the standard: having your own added features (and being succesfull with it) is fine and may even improve the overall standard.

]]> By: polyGeek.com » Blog Archive » ECMA4 is dead. Long live Actionscript! http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1021 polyGeek.com » Blog Archive » ECMA4 is dead. Long live Actionscript! Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:00:28 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1021 [...] now you’ve heard the news that ECMA 4.0 has died and been replaced by ECMA 3.1. A lot of people think it’s another power move by Microsoft and I certainly wouldn’t put it [...] [...] now you’ve heard the news that ECMA 4.0 has died and been replaced by ECMA 3.1. A lot of people think it’s another power move by Microsoft and I certainly wouldn’t put it [...]

]]> By: Ryan Stewart - Rich Internet Application Mountaineer » Blog Archive » What ECMAScript “Harmony” Means for Flash Developers http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1020 Ryan Stewart - Rich Internet Application Mountaineer » Blog Archive » What ECMAScript “Harmony” Means for Flash Developers Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:54:12 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1020 [...] working on ECMAScript 4 and instead focus on ECMAScript 3.1. And our developer community is rightly wondering what this means. In a couple of words, not [...] [...] working on ECMAScript 4 and instead focus on ECMAScript 3.1. And our developer community is rightly wondering what this means. In a couple of words, not [...]

]]> By: barry.b http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1019 barry.b Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:58:18 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1019 "Why not ECMA-334? (c#, for friends)" actually, apart from the incessant and annoying crowing of MS people like MossyBarnes ... that's an interesting idea ... I mean, it's only a standard for a while until the web evolves a bit further and we need to update again ... “Why not ECMA-334? (c#, for friends)”

actually, apart from the incessant and annoying crowing of MS people like MossyBarnes … that’s an interesting idea …

I mean, it’s only a standard for a while until the web evolves a bit further and we need to update again …

]]> By: Erick Wilder http://joshblog.net/2008/08/13/how-will-ecmascript-harmony-affect-actionscript-3/#comment-1018 Erick Wilder Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:36:53 +0000 http://joshblog.net/?p=247#comment-1018 I think that Adobe doesn't need to change AS3. My conception is that AS is "based" on the standard and it is not "pure ECMAScript", specific features on the language are completely acceptable. I think that Adobe doesn’t need to change AS3. My conception is that AS is “based” on the standard and it is not “pure ECMAScript”, specific features on the language are completely acceptable.

]]>